AM Radio Ads

NOTE: The last few posts I have written have been more general observations than meticulous breakdowns of individual ads. I promise next week will have more of the latter. But for now…

I have been listening to a lot AM radio lately and the ads tend to be mind-numbingly awful. I am not complaining. It is my choice to listen to AM radio, so I have nothing to gripe about.

AM Radio

Rather, I am disappointed. I am aware that AM radio ads are an affordable advertising option for local businesses, but I do not understand why those businesses would continue to use that option.

Internet tools offer affordable ways to reach your audience in creative ways that build your brand. AM radio ads are filler, accomplishing absolutely nothing for those small businesses. Radio ads in general, but especially AM radio, advertisements are obsolete.

Geico ads make sense on the radio. They have multi-million dollar campaigns running and radio spots help them cover all of their bases. But if your AM radio ads are only accompanied by 1/16 page phone book ads, i have to ask; “How ready are you to market your company, really?”

print ads vs internet ads

Even cool-looking, disturbing, visually pleasing, interesting print ads have nothing on click-able, customizable, interactive internet ads.

This may seem like an obvious observation. Maybe even a waste of space and time to write about.

But think about why print ads are boring for a moment?

Do print ads lose the battle with internet ads for attention because technology makes internet ads so much better?

Or maybe print ads make us yawn because they are part of a dying medium?

I thank the answers to both of the above, and other excuses, are cop-outs. Or at least the wrong questions to ask.

Closer to the right track might be thinking more along these lines:

Are print ads (and is print as a medium in general) boring because talent, creativity, and innovation have all gone to the internet?

I think the answer is “Yes,” and I am submitting this wonderful innovation as proof that the medium is not the problem (which should have you asking, “So, then, what is?”).

it’s just not breakfast without it

“Got Milk?” is one of the greatest advertising campaigns of all time.

Without going into the history of the campaign too much (which I promise to do between now and my 200th post), I want to point out the longevity of such a simple idea.

This print ad, featuring Selma Hayek and 1/3 of her daughter’s face, for example, is pretty stereotypical, dull, expected, and just generally uninteresting.

But the milk mustache, the presence of a star, and a simple tagline keep the campaign alive (and well).

Imagine a brand tagline that could last almost 20 years, including a total lack of effort over the last 15. That is incredible.

I am not bringing up this Selma Hayek ad to be a hater or to bemoan the lack of interest from the add agency (Goodby, Silverstein & Partners) and California Milk Processor Board.

My intentions are quite the opposite, actually. The truth is that add campaigns this amazing do not come along very often.

Step outside the marketing realm for a minute. The “Got Milk?” question has grown larger than almost any slogan and has outgrown the advertising world. What two words in the English language that are not the name of a celebrity, a multi-national company, or Jesus Christ ring a bell with almost every American in the same way as “Got Milk”?

The “Got Milk?” campaign evolved into something new way back in the 1990s.

The fact that the campaign needs only an occasional presence online, on TV, and in print is an astounding feat. In other words, “Got Milk?” ads exist to keep the “Got Milk?” brand alive, not the campaign.

movie trailer tuesday – the artist

 

Did this trailer make me want to see the movie?

Yes!

The trailer for The Artist is proof that music and visuals can be moving on their own. I have not yet seen this film, but apparently the entire production is a testament to this point as well.

I get easily frustrated by people who say there is not anything original out in the world any more. People are creating interesting, compelling pieces of art all the time. Some places, like Hollywood or Detroit, have a lot less of this going on than they used to. But original art still exists (Midnight in Paris is another great example in film).

Sadly for Hollywood but happily for The Artist, this trailer had more originality and magic than most films.

Was the trailer effective as a commercial?

Yes, again!

I never saw this trailer while the film was in theaters. Had I had the opportunity, I would have seen the film within days. As a commercial this trailer is engaging, curious, and filled with question-creating and imagination-igniting moments.

The Artist is currently only available to me by pirated download from the internet. If there was a legal way for me to watch it right now I would be doing that instead of sitting here writing about it. The trailer is that well done.

But a trailer this good raises a question I have posed before: Does a good film make it easier to make a good trailer?

Another, broader, way to ask this question is: Does a good product make it easier to create a good marketing campaign?

kevin durant again

Someone like me should not be allowed to have a blog.

I like to repeat points I believe in until I know I am heard and have made an impact. And since it is nearly impossible to know when you have been heard in interweb land, my blog is usually just rants about the same three things. For Infinity.

This week I have been on my soap box about Kevin Durant.

Another of my favorite topics is marketing as a series of decisions we make every day.

Today I plan to combine them, even if readers might be sick of reading about either (or both)!

I love Kevin Durant because he is among the best at what he does and he is quiet about it.

I love the idea of treating every decision one makes as a marketing decision. After all, marketing is just a fancy term for managing perceptions.

In my view, Kevin Durant is one of the athletes with the best image right now. Aaron Rogers, Payton Manning, and a small handful of baseball and basketball players fall in to this category as well. But this is a small pool – one that is harder than it may seem to stay in.

Fame and money make people do stupid things (Achem **Ben and Kobe).

Fame and money seem to have only made Kevin Durant more focused on being the best basketball player in the world.

Try googling KD’s name and see what kind of results you get. Keep in mind that nothing you see in the first few pages is a mistake.

Check out videos, twitter, facebook, and images that come up. The image that will form is that of a soft-spoken, young talent who is religious, goofy, and respected by his peers.

What happens when you google yourself? Mitt Romney? Meta World Peace?

bicycle helmet covers teach an important marketing lesson

 

I saw a bicycle helmet cover today along the lines of the above trend-centric number. The company that makes this one is called Yakkay (link above).

Before today I had no idea “fashion” covers of this kind even existed, which made me start wondering about how one might go about marketing a product like this.

A super fashionable helmet cover markets itself to a degree. The vain, super self-conscious and fashion-forward (or trendy) folks are going to find this stuff on their own.

Not that long ago (or, before the Internet era) television commercials and a heavy run of print ads would have been needed to jump start awareness and sales, but now a strategic Internet presence, some business savvy and a bunch of friends spread out all over do the trick.

I imagine the company that makes the above cover has spent some money on marketing, but I would wager that their budget is a fraction of what it might have been and they have spent at least 80% of their marketing monies in Internet arenas.

Certain products attract certain types of people. It has always been that way. The only real change is that it is cheaper, easier and more fun than ever to raise the necessary awareness your product needs in order to find its way to its natural consumer.

the google mirror

I am not sure why McDonald’s keeps popping into my head as an example for different topics this week, but I am going to keep it going today.

Try typing in McDonald’s in to Google. Let me know when you are done. I’ll wait. Take your time.

You did it? Thank you for coming back!

OK. What happened?

The entire first page was only things the McDonald’s CEO would want there.

Here is the list, in order:

An ad for the official website.

A non-ad link to the official website.

A list of all the McDonald’s locations near you. In my case, near Seattle.

The McDonald’s Wikipedia website.

Two directory listings for local locations.

The McDonald’s corporate website.

McTwitter.

McFacebook.

Another McWebsite. This one is dedicated to locations around the country. Delightfully, it is called mcstate.com.

Happy Meal’s personal website. (I had no idea such a thing existed, but I am not surprised.)

NYTimes news link for articles about McDonald’s.

And, finally, Google’s news links for “McDonald’s:

No, your company does not have as much McMoney or McManpower as McDonald’s. But your goal should always be for the first page of Google results, at least, to be a mirror you would b proud to hold up to your company.

 

radio ads

I discovered this weekend, as I drove back and forth from visiting my Grandmother in the hospital, that my car even has a radio. This baffled and excited me.

Yes, before the Internet and before television, people used to sometimes listen to a thing called the radio. When people knew what radio was, companies from all around the country would pay to have their advertisements broadcast over the airwaves. Apparently some of those companies still pay for this service (likely due either to nostalgia or a lost memo from sixty years ago).

While listening to a college basketball game on the AM frequency, I was treated to some of these delightful radio commercials.

Of course I am writing with sarcasm heaped on like bad copy used to sell insurance and new windshields.

Without doing anyone (including myself) the disservice of recreating those radio ads I heard here on the Internet, I’ll just say, “Why?”

Even if you are a small local company. Even if you are family owned. Even if you cannot afford a billboard, bus runner, local T.V. spot, or sponsoring a neighborhood softball team? Why in the name of selling your product would you pay for a radio ad?

With all that technology and complex interwoven social networks have to offer, a radio ad should always be off the table. Always.(This applies especially, but not only, to AM.)

A dime would be too much to pay.

the circle is round

It may sound like I am stating the obvious here, but the circle is round. Further more, it has no end.

Before the Internet, television, radio, billboards and even pamphlets, there was word of mouth.

Someone found something awesome and told everyone else about it.

Technology has been steadily changing the way consumers and companies tell others about interesting products and services, but the heart of the action has stayed the same. Think of it as the difference between standing in the middle of Times Square and saying something, yelling something, yelling something through a large plastic cone, yelling something through a microphone hooked up to an enormous sound system.

People all over the world talk about social media as if it is some sort of marketing revolution. As if social media is allowing us to do something new. Yes, the scope and method have both changed. But at the core, we are doing the same thing we always have: Telling the people around us about things we like.

I went to a hippy-dippy private school for grades 1 – 3 where we sang lots of songs. One of which was about friends, and it goes like this (to be sung in rounds):

“This circle is round, it has no end/ That’s what it’s like to make new friends”

And that is how I have come to think about what marketers are now calling “Word of mouth marketing.”  We have always shared things we like with people we like, now we just have an incredibly large and fast electronic pipeline uniting our network.

Television gave companies ultimate control of what was pushed to consumers. The Internet has brought us further around on our circle by connecting more people than ever before in the history of the planet. Information and ideas can now flow freely around the globe in a way our ancestors never could have imagined. The urge to share those bits of knowledge and creativity has always been there, we are just doing it again. And on a whole new scale.

The question should never be what is next. The question should always be, where on the circle are we?

best commercial ever

In an attempt to see what “the people” respond to, I typed in “best commercial ever” on Google and watched the first video that came up.

 

This gem has over 5.7 million views and nearly 11,500 comments.

Yesterday I commented on a McDonald’s commercial that I thought was really a great ad.  But results like these make me think hard about what makes a great ad.

It is impossible to say whether the 5.7 million You Tube viewers who saw this commercial are all now using condoms when they should, but you cannot argue with the numbers. People respond to comedy and cleverness.  We want to be entertained, even by commercials.

I have actually seen this commercial before, but I will give my thoughts on it as if this were my first viewing (because nothing has changed since I saw it for the first time).

I give “Best Commercial Ever” big points for managing to keep me, and 5.7 million others, around through such an obnoxious tantrum. I did not have any idea where the ad was going, and that question,”What could the product possibly be?” kept me watching.

“Use Condoms” is a terrific payoff that surprises, delights and rewards the viewer, justifying thirty five seconds of agony, embarrassment and annoyance.

The best way to get people to use your product, that is to buy into your story, is to capture their attention beyond the 30 to 60 seconds it takes them to watch your ad. I like to laugh, and the best comedy comes from the unexpected.  Most advertisements go for the cheap, easy laugh (see any Bud Light Super Bowl ad) so I always applaud ads that put a little extra thought into their comedy.  Easy has never kept people interested for very long. The Trojan ads we get here in the States are further examples of lazy advertising. They might make you chuckle, but they are more loud and blatently sexy than they are smart and thoughtful.

I may still be searching for the best commercial ever, but this one cure does an awful lot right.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers

%d bloggers like this: